Interlacing in atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy

Fast frame-rates are desirable in scanning transmission electron microscopy for a number of reasons: controlling electron beam dose, capturing in-situ events or reducing the appearance of scan distortions. Whilst several strategies exist for increasing frame-rates, many impact image quality or require investment in advanced scan hardware. Here we present an interlaced imaging approach to achieve minimal loss of image quality with faster frame-rates that can be implemented on many existing scan controllers. We further demonstrate that our interlacing approach provides the best possible strain precision for a given electron dose compared with other contemporary approaches

Increasing Spatial Fidelity and SNR of 4D-STEM using Multi-frame Data Fusion

4D-STEM, in which the 2D diffraction plane is captured for each 2D scan position in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) using a pixelated detector, is complementing and increasingly replacing existing imaging approaches. However, at present the speed of those detectors, although having drastically improved in the recent years, is still 100 to 1,000 times slower than the current PMT technology operators are used to. Regrettably, this means environmental scanning-distortion often limits the overall performance of the recorded 4D data. Here we present an extension of existing STEM distortion correction techniques for the treatment of 4D-data series. Although applicable to 4D-data in general, we use electron ptychography and electric-field mapping as model cases and demonstrate an improvement in spatial-fidelity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), phase-precision and spatial-resolution

How Fast is Your Detector? The Effect of Temporal Response on Image Quality

With increasing interest in high-speed imaging should come an increased interest in the response times of our scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) detectors. Previous works have previously highlighted and contrasted performance of various detectors for quantitative compositional or structural studies, but here we shift the focus to detector temporal response, and the effect this has on captured images. The rise and decay times of eight detectors' single electron response are reported, as well as measurements of their flatness, roundness, smoothness, and ellipticity. We develop and apply a methodology for incorporating the temporal detector response into simulations, showing that a loss of resolution is apparent in both the images and their Fourier transforms. We conclude that the solid-state detector outperforms the photomultiplier-tube (PMT) based detectors in all areas bar a slightly less elliptical central hole and is likely the best detector to use for the majority of applications. However, using tools introduced here we encourage users to effectively evaluate what detector is most suitable for their experimental needs